|
Factitious
23 June - 31 July, 2006
Gallery 1
A group exhibition
featuring works dealing with notions of fact and fiction, by:
BRIAN
CONLEY
KATE
GILMORE
PATRICK JACOBS
WILLIAM LAMSON
JOHN J. O'CONNOR
JONATHAN SCHIPPER
TAVARES STRACHAN
DANIEL ZELLER

Gallery Installation
View 1

Tavares Strachan,
"Where, What, When 2006
Dislocated remnants from simultaneous events #'s 8 and 9. Providence Rhode
Island"
Wood, paint, Plexi-Glas
17.75 x 17.75 inches

Jonathan Schipper,
"Raining Blood," 2006
Mixed Media

Jonathan Schipper,
"Raining Blood" (Detail)

William Lamson, Flight:
"Monument Valley" and "Joshua Tree," 2006
DVD, Ed. of 5

Kate Gilmore, "Every
Girl Loves Pink," 2006
DVD, Ed. of 5

John J. O’Connor,
"Nostradamus," 2005
Graphite and Colored Pencil on Paper
82.25 x 52.5 inches
Press Release
The
definition of the word “factitious” reads, “produced
by human rather than by natural forces; produced by special effort.”
The sound of the word, however, suggests other meanings, such as a merging
of fact and fiction. The work of the artists included in this exhibition
reference these notions in various ways.
Brian Conley’s Decipherment of Linear X project
includes photographs, ceramic tablets, and the Decipherment of Linear
X journal he edited. This work centers on a fictitious language of symbols
that Conley treated as an actual proto-language. It began with sticks
and logs that Conley unearthed which are covered by distinct incisions,
often in X formations, that resemble some of the earliest written languages,
such as Minoan Linear A and B. The incisions were actually made by a type
of beetle that lives between the bark of the tree and the woody interior.
From the incised logs Conley rolled ceramic tablets, then created a kind
of alphabet of individual symbols. For the journal he asked a variety
of historians, philosophers, poets, etc. to write about Linear X as if
it was a real language.
Tavares Strachan’s work deals with displacements
and duplications, among other ideas. The work for this exhibition, “Where,
What, When, 2006 (Dislocated remnants from simultaneous events #'s 8 and
9. Providence Rhode Island)” consists of two identically shattered
window panes inside wood and Plexi glass vitrines. Both windows have been
laser cut to have the same break that references an original found broken
window. The “real” broken window has been replaced with identical
fictional windows. In a related project, Strachan duplicated a single
broken window in an abandoned building as a series of the same broken
windows across the facade of the building.
Patrick Jacobs’ dioramas viewed through small lenses
set flush with the wall are secretive fictional worlds that mimic the
real world and accentuate banal scenes, such as a field of dandelions,
a recently vacated rodent’s nest, or the corner of a linoleum covered
kitchen floor; places that a person may pass-up until Jacobs makes these
incredible studies of disregarded nature.
Daniel Zeller’s intricate ink drawings oscillate
between topographical studies and biological organisms. They are made
up using a vocabulary of marks that Zeller has created and are entirely
his own, but at the same time they reference elements of the natural world.
John O’Connor is fascinated with statistics and
information. As an artist he is also interested in subverting his own
aesthetic decisions with chance elements based on an underlying logic
of facts. He begins each large-scale work on paper, generally done entirely
in colored pencil and graphite, with a subject matter and data in mind.
The work in this exhibition, “Nostradamus,” began with a Nostradamus
prophecy predicting religious turmoil and wars. O’Connor “translated”
the original French text and the English version into numerical data to
be used as plotting points. Unlike Oulipo poets, he does not stick rigidly
to an arbitrary system. Rather, he begins with a system and alters it
as he works, according to chance. His works are ultimately visual fictions
created using facts as a beginning point.
Jonathan Schipper’s work relates to notions of
fact and fiction more poetically. For his piece, “Raining Blood,”
in this exhibition he has taken a classical plaster figure of a Greek
god, approximately 3 feet tall, cut him apart at the joints, and hard
wired him to a machine that “plays” the Slayer song, “Raining
Blood.” The song has been converted to a player piano reel so that
the machine is activated according to the beat. The figure does not so
much dance to the song as moves to its underlying logic.
In her video performances Kate Gilmore creates uncomfortable
situations for herself and the viewer. These are real predicaments but
ones that have been fabricated by the artist. Her work forces you to squirm
and twist in strange empathetic reaction to her predicament. In the video
included in this exhibition, “Every Girl Loves Pink,” Gilmore
has placed herself in an impossible position from which she tries to escape.
The entire video is based on this frustrated escape, in this case perhaps
from the cultural stereotype that all girls love pink. Here she is trapped,
in a jack-knife position with both her head and her feet up, at the bottom
of a triangular shaped wooden box which is filled with crumpled pink paper.
She must first free herself from all of the pink and then attempt to lift
herself up and out.
William Lamson’s videos in this exhibition are
from a series called “Flight” (“Joshua Tree” and
“Monument Valley”). In these works Lamson creates a series
of engagingly ridiculous flight tests using a jumbo-sized paper airplane
and what resembles a giant slingshot that he has constructed. Wearing
a white jumpsuit he sets up a variety of launch sites, the rubber sling
shot positioned between over sized and breathtaking rock formations (Joshua
Tree), or at the end of a long butte (Monument Valley). The real world
passes by in the distance, in the form of miniature cars occasionally
moving along a local road, while Lamson valiantly attempts to make his
paper airplane fly.
Also
on view, the ever-changing and peripatetic Flat Files housing original
works by 750+ artists
|